📖 Why web crypto terminals are essential for advanced traders
The crypto market never sleeps and demands speed, precision, and strict discipline from traders. Web‑based crypto terminals help meet that challenge: they unify accounts from multiple exchanges into a single interface, add smart order types and bots, eliminate repetitive work, and enable the execution of even the most complex strategies.
Objective: compare leading web‑based terminals for active trading and automation. We’ll examine functionality (bots, signals, exchange integrations, APIs, visual strategy builders), evaluate UX, security, and pricing models, and outline scenarios where each platform excels. In this review: Finandy, 3Commas, HaasOnline, Cryptohopper, Altrady, WunderTrading, and Bitsgap.
⚙️ Key features and selection criteria for web terminals
Below is a checklist of criteria seasoned traders use to evaluate web terminals—effectively a requirements spec for comfortable and safe daily operations.
- Exchange integrations: how many venues are supported, whether multiple accounts can be connected simultaneously, and API reliability.
- Automation and bots: availability of built‑in templates (DCA, grid, market‑making, arbitrage, etc.), fine‑grained control of entries/exits, and operation on external signals.
- Signals and social trading: ingesting signals (e.g., from TradingView) and/or copying top traders with transparent statistics.
- Strategy editors and backtesting: visual builders or scripting languages, plus historical testing with fees and slippage accounted for.
- Interface and reporting: UI ergonomics, depth of analytics, notification system, and the quality of the mobile app.
- Security: secure API‑key storage, two‑factor authentication, activity logs, and vendor reputation.
- Pricing: free tiers and trials, subscription cost, limits on bots/accounts, and any additional fees.
💻 Overview of the main web terminals
Below is a practical breakdown focused on real‑world use. For each platform, you’ll see who it suits best and when, plus a clear summary of pros and cons.
Finandy
Finandy is a web‑based terminal for Binance and OKX with advanced order types and built‑in bots. It stands out for a low barrier to entry and the ability to connect signals without unnecessary restrictions.
- Core functionality is free—test without a subscription.
- Suitable for active trading on Binance/OKX with flexible take‑profits, stops, and grids.
- Convenient for ingesting external signals (e.g., via webhooks) without switching your primary exchange.
✅ Pros
- Advanced order types: trailing stops, floating limit orders, and virtual orders that don’t lock funds.
- Automation: support for signals (including TradingView), copy trading, and built‑in bots (DCA, grid, etc.).
- Risk management: position sizing from SL, breakeven price with fees, and clear PnL reports.
- API optimization: rate‑limit protection and smart connection routing.
- Accessibility: core capabilities are free, so you can start without upfront costs.
❌ Cons
- Exchange scope: only Binance and OKX.
- Limited transparency: little public information about the team and jurisdiction.
- No mobile app: management is web‑only.
- Constrained bot ecosystem: no strategy marketplace; emphasis on manual setup and signal import.
Key point:
⭐ 3.9
~9,000 reviews
3Commas
3Commas is one of the best‑known all‑in‑one suites for automated trading: a single dashboard for many exchanges, the Smart Trade order suite, and a rich library of bots for different market regimes.
- Good for a multi‑exchange portfolio: more than a dozen integrations and a unified control panel.
- Especially useful if you regularly build complex take‑profit/stop chains unavailable in standard exchange interfaces.
- Suitable for those willing to pay for the convenience of ready‑made bots and fine‑tuning options.
✅ Pros
- Diverse bots: DCA, grid, signal bots, quick‑start presets, and flexible parameters for bespoke strategies.
- Smart Trade: multiple take‑profit targets, trailing take‑profit and stop‑loss, partial‑exit scenarios—build a trade in a few clicks.
- Broad exchange coverage & mobility: convenient multi‑venue work and native iOS/Android apps.
- Ecosystem: marketplace for strategies and signals, active community, and educational resources.
❌ Cons
- Security history: a high‑profile incident with compromised API keys; security has been strengthened, but trust is personal.
- Paid for live trading: the free mode is effectively a demo; full operation requires a paid plan.
- Lower‑tier limits: caps on bots and features encourage upgrading.
- Learning curve: abundant settings and terminology can be daunting for newcomers; advanced traders will feel at home.
Key point:
⭐ 4.0
~22,000 reviews
HaasOnline
HaasOnline is a veteran platform for algorithmic traders. With the HaasScript scripting language, a wide range of integrations, cloud or self‑hosted deployment, and serious backtesting, it supports strategies of virtually any complexity.
- Best for algo traders who need granular control with minimal compromises.
- Ideal if off‑the‑shelf bots fall short and you want to compose behavior from your own building blocks.
- Well‑suited to cross‑exchange tasks: support for dozens of venues, including derivatives, enables arbitrage and hedging.
✅ Pros
- Maximum customizability: HaasScript lets you implement almost any idea—from indicator systems to complex reactive logic.
- Professional‑grade backtesting: historical runs with fees and slippage, detailed reports, and analytics.
- Broad integrations: many spot and derivatives exchanges, external signals, notifications, and ecosystem hooks.
- Flexible deployment: cloud or self‑hosted to balance convenience and control.
❌ Cons
- Steep learning curve: without scripting, it’s hard to unlock the platform’s potential.
- Mobility: no native mobile app; primary use is web/desktop.
- Price: higher than mass‑market tools; short trials and significant subscription costs.
- Less drag‑and‑drop: visual editors exist, but the emphasis is on code—unsuitable for some workflows.
Key point:
⭐ 3.8
~450 reviews
Cryptohopper
Cryptohopper is a cloud platform that combines ease of entry with a robust marketplace of strategies and signals. It runs 24/7 without your computer, supports many exchanges, and offers a visual rules builder.
- Good for a quick start with ready solutions (signals, bot templates) and then tuning them to your needs.
- Appeals to those who mix manual trading with automation and value round‑the‑clock cloud execution.
- Great for multi‑exchange work: a broad pool of venues and a universal interface.
✅ Pros
- Strategy marketplace: an ecosystem of signals and pre‑built configurations—no need to start from scratch.
- Range of modes: bots for spot and futures, market‑making, arbitrage, DCA, and more.
- No code: a visual Strategy Designer to create logic from blocks and conditions.
- 24/7 in the cloud: no need to keep a computer running; notifications and mobile apps included.
❌ Cons
- Plan dependence: strict limits on lower tiers; the “full package” is noticeably pricier.
- Deep customization is capped: truly unique rules aren’t always implementable within the builder, unlike code‑first platforms.
- Choosing signals is on you: you’ll need time and filters to find those that truly work.
Key point:
⭐ 4.2
~2,500 reviews
Altrady
Altrady is a universal terminal of European origin: multi‑exchange trading, unified portfolio analytics, smart orders, and notifications. Bots are available as an add‑on—the emphasis is on a convenient manual workflow.
- Well‑suited for active day traders: everything at hand—charts, order books, time & sales, cross‑exchange overview, and alerts.
- Suitable if you want simple helper bots rather than a fully algorithmic environment.
- Valued for its mobile app and structured reporting on positions and PnL.
✅ Pros
- Unified trading workspace: “one panel—many exchanges,” fewer context switches, fewer operational errors.
- Alert system: timely notifications about market moves and position events—react without constantly sitting in the terminal.
- Smart orders: ready entry/TP/SL bundles, auto‑move to breakeven, and trade‑management scenarios.
- Bots for basic tasks: grid and signal—everyday helpers that don’t replace a custom algo environment.
- Mobility: native app convenient for monitoring and quick edits.
❌ Cons
- Limited automation: complex strategies call for a more heavyweight platform.
- Subscription model: there’s a trial, but long‑term use requires paid packages.
- No social trading: no built‑in copy trading or strategy marketplace—the emphasis is on self‑directed trading.
- Shorter integration list than leaders: core exchanges are covered, but the long tail is rarer.
- Pro‑grade interface: many panels and data—great for experienced traders, but a potential barrier for newcomers.
Key point:
⭐ 4.4
~1,000 reviews
WunderTrading (Wunderbit)
WunderTrading started with copy trading and grew into a full‑fledged terminal with bots and deep integration of TradingView signals. It shines where the “signals → auto‑execution” link and the social component matter.
- Optimal for automating TradingView strategies: webhooks → bot without writing exchange‑API code.
- Popular with social‑trading fans: a storefront of traders, transparent metrics, and flexible copy parameters.
- A wide set of bots: DCA, GRID, market‑neutral approaches, and more—convenient coverage of different scenarios under one roof.
✅ Pros
- Copy trading out of the box: subscriptions to top traders, proportional copying, and risk controls.
- Native TradingView integration: webhooks turn a Pine script into an executable bot.
- Algorithms for varied conditions: from DCA to arbitrage and spread ideas, including market‑neutral strategies.
- Many exchanges: broad spot and derivatives integrations, convenient parallel bot operation.
- Free tier and trials: a free plan with limits and trial periods on higher tiers.
❌ Cons
- Free‑plan limits: a cap on active bots; some modes are paid‑only.
- Choosing leaders to copy is your responsibility: analyze statistics and apply sound risk management.
- Interface learning threshold: many modules and scenarios—useful but time‑consuming to master.
- Regulatory constraints: certain features may depend on jurisdiction and KYC requirements.
- Newest features: the freshest modes may still need polishing—build in a margin of caution.
Key point:
⭐ 4.3
~750 reviews
Bitsgap
Bitsgap is a “Swiss Army knife” for automated trading and arbitrage with an emphasis on quick setup and clear analytics: grid and DCA bots, combined strategies, and cross‑exchange spread monitoring.
- Suitable for those who want to get started with bots quickly—ready templates for different market regimes.
- Attractive for arbitrageurs: convenient discovery and execution tools for cross‑exchange discrepancies.
- Strong on visualization: clear dashboards for bots, PnL, positions, and fees.
✅ Pros
- Multi‑terminal: supports many spot exchanges and several derivatives venues—manage from one window.
- Diverse bots: classic grid for spot, DCA for spot and futures, and combined modes like the Combo bot.
- Reporting & clarity: detailed PnL breakdown, exportable history, and clear performance charts.
- User‑friendly interface: quick to learn, Russian localization available, convenient for rapid setup.
- Reasonable pricing: plans below the market average, plus a top‑tier trial for a full test drive.
❌ Cons
- No fully free tier for live trading: after the trial, a subscription is required.
- Futures not on all exchanges: the emphasis is primarily on spot and arbitrage scenarios.
- No mobile app: control is via the web; responsive layout exists but there’s no dedicated app.
- Limited logic customization: parameters are set within predefined schemes; end‑to‑end custom strategies aren’t programmable.
- No social trading: no strategy marketplace or copy trading—the focus is on individual work.
Key point:
⭐ 4.1
~3,200 reviews
📊 Platform comparison table
The table below helps you quickly compare key capabilities and constraints. Prices are rounded and may vary depending on promotions and billing.
| 💻 Platform | 🔗 Exchange support | 🤖 Automation | 🛠️ Strategies | 📱 Mobility | 💵 Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finandy | Binance, OKX |
✅ DCA, Grid, signals, copy |
❌ No code manual configuration |
🌐 Web responsive |
Free + premium options |
| 3Commas | 15+ exchanges Binance, Kraken… |
✅ DCA, Grid, Smart Trade |
🖥️ UI builder | 📱 iOS / Android | 🎁 Demo from ~$37/mo |
| HaasOnline | 20+ exchanges spot + derivatives |
⚡ Any logic HaasScript |
💻 Code / flowcharts | 🌐 Web | 🎁 Trial from ~$90/mo |
| Cryptohopper | 16+ exchanges Binance, Kraken… |
✅ DCA, MM, arbitrage |
🖥️ Visual designer |
📱 iOS / Android | Free* / from $19 *limited |
| Altrady | 12+ exchanges Binance, Coinbase… |
✅ Grid, Signal basic bots |
❌ No code Smart orders |
📱 iOS / Android | from ~€17/mo trial available |
| WunderTrading | 15+ exchanges Binance, Bybit… |
✅ DCA, Grid, TradingView |
❌ No code UI + webhooks |
📱 Android / Web | Free + from $9.95 |
| Bitsgap | 15+ exchanges Binance, OKX… |
✅ Grid, DCA, Combo |
❌ No code templates |
🌐 Web | from ~$23/mo 7‑day trial |
Note: exchange lists and prices serve as reference points for comparison and are periodically updated by the platforms. Confirm current terms before choosing a plan.
✅ Conclusion
Web terminals have become core infrastructure for experienced crypto traders. They remove routine, enforce execution discipline, and let you scale ideas through automation. There is no one‑size‑fits‑all solution—the right choice depends on your tasks and trading style.
Platform summary — quick picks:
- Finandy: maximum order flexibility on
Binance/OKX without a subscription; good for signals and basic bots. - 3Commas: multi‑exchange all‑in‑one with advanced bots and
Smart Trade ; convenience for a subscription. - HaasOnline: the algo traders’ choice—full freedom with
HaasScript and robust backtesting. - Cryptohopper: cloud plus a strategy marketplace; easy to start with ready solutions and scale up.
- Altrady: a workbench for manual multi‑exchange trading with smart order chains and alerts.
- WunderTrading: the
TradingView signals → auto‑execution stack plus social trading and arbitrage approaches. - Bitsgap: fast bot launch (Grid/DCA/Combo), clear analytics, and arbitrage tools.
Practice shows the best way to choose is to test. Use free tiers and trials, launch bots with small sizes or in demo, and evaluate connector stability and interface convenience for your routines. Automation amplifies a trader but doesn’t replace one—strategies require supervision, and risk management remains the cornerstone.
Key point: choose a terminal that fits your workflow: