📖 Who uses multisig solutions and where they apply
Multisig crypto wallets are wallets where more than one key is required to authorize a transaction. This makes storing crypto far safer by removing a single point of failure and reducing the risk of theft.
In recent years, multisig has moved from a niche “paranoid” tool to a security standard for teams, funds, and even individual traders. It’s now supported across all major blockchains—from Bitcoin and Ethereum to Solana and Tron.
In this guide, we’ll explain how multisig works, common real‑world schemes (2‑of‑3, 3‑of‑5, etc.), its benefits and limitations, and which services and wallets offer robust multisig solutions in 2025.
Tip: start with a small amount and practice the full flow: creating a proposal, collecting M‑of‑N signatures, canceling, and recovering with backup keys.
What is a multisig wallet and how does it work?
A multisig wallet is a crypto wallet that requires several independent private keys to authorize operations. Think of it as a safe with multiple locks: one key isn’t enough to open the safe and move funds—you need several at once. For example, a “3‑of‑5” scheme means that at least three of five trusted keys must sign the transaction. Until that threshold is met, the transfer is blocked—no single person can spend funds unilaterally.How a transaction works
One co‑owner initiates a transfer, after which the wallet waits for the required number of digital signatures from the other participants. Once the quorum is reached and the signatures are valid, the transaction is executed. If any required participant fails to confirm, the transfer won’t go through. This removes the single point of failure: even if one key is compromised, the funds cannot be stolen. If one key is lost, access to assets isn’t lost—the remaining co‑owners can still control the wallet. You can also include backup keys for recovery.Multisig scheme parameters
The core parameters are N (total keys) and M (signature threshold). M‑of‑N literally means “M out of N”.- 2‑of‑3 – baseline protection
- 3‑of‑5 or 4‑of‑6 – enhanced security
- 1‑of‑2 – pointless; effectively the same as a single key
Important: choose an M that balances security with recoverability. Many implementations cap N technically (e.g., up to 15 keys), but such large setups are rare in practice.
🔐 Want maximum protection for your crypto?
A hardware wallet is a reliable way to protect your assets from hacks and theft. We’ve collected vetted models with the best price‑to‑security ratio.
See the best hardware walletsMultisig vs. other wallet types
Single‑key wallets
Single‑key wallets are standard crypto wallets where control is tied to one private key or seed phrase. Operations are signed instantly by a single owner.- 🔹 Pros: simple to use; fast signing and sending; minimal technical overhead.
- 🔻 Cons: one key = one point of failure; loss or theft of the key means total loss of access; fine for personal use and small sums but risky for large holdings due to the single secret vulnerability.
Multisig wallets
Multiple keys are required to sign operations. The main advantage is the absence of unilateral control and a major security boost: funds can’t be stolen by compromising a single device or seed phrase. Multisig enables shared treasury management—great for groups, companies, and decentralized organizations that need collective control.- 🔹 Pros: no single point of failure; control can be distributed across any number of participants; robust solution for storing large sums.
- 🔻 Cons: more complex setup and usage; transactions take longer because you must gather signatures; fees can be higher (Bitcoin: more data per transaction; Ethereum: smart‑contract calls consume gas).
Smart‑contract wallets
These wallets are programs on the blockchain that encode arbitrary control logic. On platforms like Ethereum, multisig is often implemented as a contract wallet: the code stores the list of owners and the required quorum. Example: Gnosis Safe (now Safe)—a popular contract enabling a group to control ETH, ERC‑20 tokens, and even NFTs.- 🔹 Advantages: flexibility—set multisig rules, limits, time locks, owner rotation, social recovery, and more; one contract can manage many asset types.
- 🔻 Drawbacks: depends on code security (critical bugs have occurred historically); gas costs; only works on smart‑contract chains; on Bitcoin, such logic requires additional layers like Rootstock.
MPC wallets
MPC (Multi‑Party Computation) is a newer approach to distributed key custody. Unlike classic multisig with several full private keys, MPC uses one “virtual” key split among participants. Instead of multiple on‑chain signatures, MPC participants jointly compute a single signature acceptable to the blockchain. In other words, classic multisig shows M signatures from N keys on‑chain; MPC produces one signature derived off‑chain.- 🔹 Pros: transactions look standard—no leak of participant count; works even on chains without native multisig; quorums and membership can be changed off‑chain more flexibly.
- 🔻 Cons: complex cryptography; commonly closed, proprietary custodian solutions (e.g., Fireblocks, Qredo) that require trust in a provider; theoretically vulnerable to collusion; low transparency—observers can’t see who approved.
Takeaway: many experts view vetted multisig and contract wallets as more transparent and decentralized than black‑box MPC. MPC is popular with exchanges/institutions; among consumer wallets, ZenGo is a notable example (no seed phrase; key shares split between device and server).
Advantages of multisig wallets
🛡️ Eliminates a single point of failure
Multisig protects against compromise of a single key: an attacker can’t drain funds by stealing one private key or seed phrase. Until M independent keys are compromised, funds remain safe. This effectively counters:- Theft or leakage of a private key.
- Compromise of one device.
- Exposure of one seed phrase.
Takeaway: the attacker would need to breach several devices/owners at once—practically infeasible.
🤝 Shared control and delegated permissions
Multisig lets you split control across multiple people or entities. Critical for:- Businesses and corporate treasuries.
- Crypto projects.
- Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).
- 2‑of‑2 — e.g., CFO and CEO both sign.
- 3‑of‑5 — majority of the board must sign.
Takeaway: this raises transparency and trust—no one can secretly move funds without others noticing.
💰 Safer long‑term storage and large balances
Multisig is ideal for cold storage of significant capital. Even if one key is lost, funds remain recoverable—use backup keys or well‑designed recovery procedures. A common 3‑of‑5 setup stores five keys in separate secure locations:- Bank safe‑deposit box.
- Home safe.
- Trusted custodian or attorney.
- Add relatives or a lawyer as co‑signers.
- Ensure heirs can access funds under predefined conditions.
Takeaway: multisig protects major holdings and supports secure inheritance plans.
🔒 Protection from phishing and user error
Even if a scammer tricks one co‑owner and gets partial secrets, multisig won’t immediately allow theft. Without the other signatures, the attack fails. Multisig reduces risk when:- A seed phrase is captured via a phishing site.
- One user’s device is compromised.
- Malware is present on a computer.
- Users make input mistakes.
Takeaway: completing a transfer still requires confirmations from other devices that can be offline or held by other trusted people.
⚙️ Flexible access control
Many multisig implementations support role separation and dynamic membership, which adapts to various scenarios. Configuration options:- Weighted keys with different permissions.
- Changing the signature threshold.
- Time locks for large transactions.
- Custom safety rules.
Takeaway: multisig fits everything from family savings to complex corporate treasury workflows.
📜 Trusted custody and escrow
Multisig is widely used in escrow and shared accounts to secure deals and reduce fraud. Examples:- Trade escrow: create a 2‑of‑3 address where the signers are buyer, seller, and an arbitrator. Funds are released to the seller only if at least two sign.
- On exchanges: client funds are held in 2‑of‑3 arrangements. If a client loses a key, the custodian can help recover access.
- Scale: used by individuals and major market players alike. BitGo has protected transactions totaling over $64B with multisig, and the Safe (Gnosis Safe) contract secures more than $100B in crypto assets.
Takeaway: multisig schemes improve trade security, protect exchange balances, and have proven effective at the scale of hundreds of billions of dollars.
Drawbacks and risks of multisig wallets
🧩 Setup and operational complexity
Multisig wallets are significantly more complex than standard ones. They require coordination among participants, exchanging public keys, creating a shared script/contract address, and safely storing multiple pieces. Beginners can easily get confused and make mistakes. Even for advanced users, signing in a 3‑of‑5 scheme involves exporting a partially signed transaction, moving it to other devices for additional signatures, etc. These steps slow you down and demand discipline.⚠️ Delays when transacting
You can’t send instantly at the whim of one person—you need time to collect approvals. This limits speed: you might not react to market moves or urgent transfers until the necessary co‑owners are reachable. A common approach is a hybrid setup: keep an operational hot balance on a single‑key wallet, but store core funds in multisig for safety.⚠️ Higher transaction costs
Multisignature usually increases transaction size or requires extra code execution. Fees can be higher. In Bitcoin, transaction size grows with each signature—e.g., three signatures cost notably more than one, all else equal. When the network is congested, consolidating UTXOs on a multisig address can be pricey. In Ethereum and other EVM chains, multisig is a contract—calling it costs gas, so you pay a bit more for security. In some networks, configuring a multisig account itself has a fee—for example, on TRON, changing account permissions costs 100 TRX.⚠️ Risk of losing access
Paradoxically, multisig can raise the risk of lockout if people are careless with backups. In a 2‑of‑3 scheme, losing two keys means permanent loss—funds are locked forever. Single‑key wallets make it obvious you have one critical secret to protect at all costs. In multisig, a false sense of safety (“we still have two keys left”) can lead to lax storage. If multiple pieces are lost, access is gone. It’s especially dangerous when the right people become unavailable or disengaged—e.g., one DAO member loses their hardware key, another leaves the company and can’t be reached, and the treasury is stuck.Tip: minimize lockout risk by choosing an M‑of‑N with redundancy and a recovery plan. Ideally maintain backup keys or emergency mechanisms (e.g., time‑based threshold reduction in a force majeure).
🚫 Patchy support across wallets and services
Not all software wallets support multisig out of the box. You may need specialized apps—e.g., Electrum, Specter for Bitcoin, Safe App for Ethereum—or web interfaces. This reduces choice and convenience. Popular mobile wallets like Trust Wallet, MetaMask, etc. don’t let you simply create a multisig address. Some exchanges/payment services refuse deposits to certain multisig formats, and P2SH deposits in Bitcoin can require extra steps. The new Ethereum Account Abstraction (EIP‑4337) aims to make contract wallets—including multisig—more user‑friendly, but mass adoption is gradual through 2025.🛠️ Potential code or design vulnerabilities
A multisig wallet is only as secure as its weakest link—people or software. We covered human risks (phishing, key loss), but technical risk matters too: if multisig is implemented via a smart contract, a bug can be catastrophic. A notorious case is the Parity multisig bug on Ethereum in 2017. Due to an error, a user accidentally gained owner rights to the wallet library and then, trying to fix it, bricked funds across hundreds of projects—about $300M at the time. A poorly designed contract became a bigger risk than the intended protection. The remedy is to use audited, proven implementations. Fortunately, popular multisig contracts (like Safe) are open source and heavily audited, minimizing bug risk. Still, the Parity incident taught the community: trust only truly battle‑tested code or native protocol features.Bottom line: multisig wallets greatly improve security but require mature processes and trust among participants. They shine where procedures are robust (companies, responsible communities) and aren’t always ideal for everyday small payments.
Multisig support across blockchains
Multisignature mechanics depend on each blockchain’s capabilities. Some chains support multisig natively at the protocol level; others require smart contracts or specialized tools. Below are five popular networks and their approaches.
₿ Bitcoin (BTC)
Bitcoin has native multisig since 2012 via script primitives. The OP_CHECKMULTISIG opcode lets you create an address tied to multiple public keys. Such an address (P2SH or P2WSH) “embeds” the rule for how many signatures are required to spend.
📌 Typical configuration
- — 2‑of‑3: spending coins requires 2 signatures from 3 keys.
- — Understood by all nodes natively—no extra layers needed.
🧰 Practical use
- — Exchange cold‑storage wallets.
- — Services like BitGo and Casa for clients.
- — Power users for personal security.
By 2024, millions of BTC are held on multisig addresses: a simple, time‑tested implementation independent of external code.
⚙️ SegWit and Taproot
- — Data optimizations and lower fees.
- — Privacy: Schnorr‑based schemes (e.g.,
MuSig2) combine signatures into one, hiding participant count.
⚠️ Technical limits
- — Up to 15 public keys per scheme.
- — Transaction size grows with each additional signer.
- — 2‑of‑3 and 3‑of‑5 are most common.
Takeaway: modern wallets (Electrum, Sparrow, Specter, etc.) let you create multisig addresses by sharing participants’ public keys and generating a joint address. Signing requires exchanging partially signed transactions (files or QR codes) between devices—more involved than “Send,” but far more secure. Even the Lightning Network is built on 2‑of‑2 multisig channels between nodes, making multisig a foundation of Bitcoin L2.
Ξ Ethereum (ETH)
In Ethereum and EVM chains, multisig wallets are implemented as smart contracts. Unlike Bitcoin, Ethereum doesn’t natively require multiple signatures for an account—an EOA has one owner key, or you use a contract with programmable logic. Thus, contract‑based multisigs appeared early on.
The first popular wallet (Parity Multisig) launched in 2016–2017 but became infamous for a major bug. The more successful and reliable implementation is Safe (formerly Gnosis Safe), now the de‑facto standard for EVM multisig.
🔑 Safe (formerly Gnosis Safe)
A smart contract that stores the owner list and threshold. When an owner initiates a transaction (transfer or contract call), the Safe records it and waits for confirmations from other owners. Once the threshold is reached, the contract executes the operation.
Safe is modular and feature‑rich: plug‑in modules and guards (security rules), social recovery, spending limits, delays, and more. The code is open and formally verified.
📌 Usage
- — Popular with DAOs, funds, and DeFi projects.
- — Supports 14+ networks (Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, BNB Chain, etc.).
- — Manages over $100B in assets.
- — Web interface (Safe App), mobile apps, extensions, and 200+ dApp integrations.
⚠️ Limitations
- — Every action costs gas—more expensive than EOA transactions.
- — Standard setup gives equal owner rights—weighted voting needs extra modules.
- — Advanced logic often means multiple Safes or custom modules.
🛠️ Other options
Beyond Safe: older MultiSigWallet (Parity), Argent (social recovery), Sparrow, Zebra, and others—yet Safe dominates. Since 2022, Safe spun out from Gnosis, introduced the SAFE token and a DAO, and now pushes account abstraction. With EIP‑4337, multisig‑style smart accounts should become easier for mainstream users.
💡 Use cases
- — Securing DeFi protocol admin keys (e.g., 4‑of‑6 community leaders must approve code upgrades).
- — Personal security: M‑of‑N where some keys are held by the owner and others by trusted contacts who don’t know about each other.
- — Vitalik Buterin reportedly uses a Safe multisig for most of his ETH and recommends this approach.
Takeaway: multisig on Ethereum is mature and flexible; Safe is the standard across EVM chains. As account abstraction (EIP‑4337) spreads, multisig smart accounts will become even more accessible.
◎ Solana (SOL)
Solana’s account model didn’t originally provide a simple multisig for normal addresses. Each account has one “owner”—either a private key or a program (contract). Thus, a shared wallet requires a dedicated multisig program that owns the funds.
Leading solutions include Squads and Cashmere. They follow a Safe‑like pattern for Solana: a program account tracks member public keys and threshold. The program derives a PDA (Program Derived Address) that holds SOL and SPL tokens; funds move only via program calls with required signatures.
📌 Support and limitations
- — Historically, you needed specific apps (e.g., Squads UI) or CLI tools.
- — Popular wallets (Phantom, Solflare) lacked built‑in multisig for a long time.
- — Backpack added multisig support for hardware wallets (Ledger, Trezor, Keystone) as signers.
- — Unlike Ethereum, all signers often need to be online within the same window; otherwise, you rebuild the transaction.
🛠️ Alternatives
Solana has limited native multisig for SPL token accounts (in the Solana Program Library), enabling multiple admins for token minting, etc. For SOL itself, you still need a program wallet.
⚙️ Technical notes
- — The multisig program should be audited and free of backdoors.
- — Squads and similar protocols are open source with no stealthy rule changes.
- — Ideally, the program should be non‑upgradable so no one can secretly alter rules.
Takeaway: Solana multisig is used mostly by DAOs and ecosystem projects today. As Solana DeFi grows, demand for collective custody rises. Expect deeper multisig integrations in mainstream wallets.
TRON (TRX)
On Tron, multisig is native via Account Permission Management, similar to EOS. An account can have multiple keys with different roles and “weights,” and transactions can require combined signatures meeting a threshold. You don’t create a separate wallet—you modify permissions on your existing account to add co‑owners.📌 Access levels
- — Owner — full control (key changes, critical ops).
- — Active — everyday actions (transfers, dApp interactions).
- — Witness — for super representatives.
💡 Advantages
- — Multisig is built into the chain—no intermediary contracts.
- — Fine‑grained role separation (e.g., daily transfers via Active; key rotation via Owner).
- — Convenient for organizations and team treasury.
⚠️ Limits & implementation
- — Historically configured via TronScan or SDKs.
- — Some wallets (TokenPocket, TronLink) now include permissions UI.
- — Changing permissions costs 100 TRX (one‑time).
- — Adding someone else’s address as co‑owner means you no longer have unilateral control.
🚨 Fraud risks
In 2024, “multisig bonus wallet” scams surged: victims import a “pre‑funded” 2‑of‑2 wallet where the scammer holds the second key. To withdraw, the scammer demands TRX “for fees” and disappears. Funds remain blocked by the second signer.Warning: never import someone else’s seed or “bonus” wallet. Adding an unknown co‑owner to your multisig will lock your funds.
Takeaway: Tron is one of few chains with account‑level multisig. It’s powerful for organizations but unfamiliar to many users. Double‑check co‑owners and ignore “bonus wallet” offers.
🟡 BNB Smart Chain (BSC)
BNB Smart Chain (BSC) is Binance’s EVM‑compatible chain. There’s no native multisig at the protocol level, but smart contracts can provide it. Gnosis Safe is deployed on BSC, and many ecosystem projects use Safe‑style multisigs.📌 BNB Safe
In 2024, BNB Chain launched BNB Safe—a multisig wallet based on Safe. It works on BSC mainnet and the opBNB L2. Users can create multisig wallets via web or mobile, connecting a standard wallet. Safe’s well‑known code makes multisig accessible across BSC communities and projects.💡 Support
- — Web UI and mobile app with BSC support.
- — Manage treasury from your phone with a few taps.
- — Hardware‑wallet support for private keys.
⚠️ Limitations
- — Similar to Ethereum: extra gas costs and user‑error risk.
- — Requires a Web3 wallet for signing (browser extension or WalletConnect).
- — All co‑owners must use devices compatible with the Safe apps.
🔒 Ecosystem use
- — The main BSC↔Ethereum bridge is controlled by a multisig of Binance validators.
- — After the bridge hack in Oct‑2022, emergency updates were coordinated via multisig.
- — Multisig reduces infrastructure compromise risk from a single key breach.
Takeaway: with BNB Safe, multisig is now straightforward on BSC. You can spin up a secure multisig quickly—even without deep Ethereum experience.
Popular multisig wallets and solutions
Safe (formerly Gnosis Safe)
🌐 Supported blockchains
- — Ethereum mainnet and 14+ networks: Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche, BNB Chain, Gnosis Chain, etc.
- — Single interface across networks.
- — No support for Bitcoin or Solana (Safe is EVM‑only).
⚙️ Features
- — M‑of‑N multisig with arbitrary M and N.
- — Equal owner rights by default.
- — Optional security modules (social recovery, delays for large withdrawals, etc.).
- — Integrates with hundreds of dApps: DEXs, DAOs, NFT markets, and more—no need to transfer assets out.
🖥️ Interface
- — Web dashboard and iOS/Android apps.
- — WalletConnect support for third‑party wallets.
- — Works with MetaMask, Ledger, Trust Wallet, and many others.
- — Sign via browser extensions or hardware devices.
🔒 Security
- — Open, audited, and heavily battle‑tested contracts.
- — Used by major projects: Uniswap, Aave, OpenZeppelin, DAOs, funds, and well‑known individuals.
- — In 2024, Safe wallets collectively secured over $100B.
📂 Open source
- — Contracts, SDK, and interface are open source.
- — SafeDAO governs the ecosystem parameters.
👥 Who it’s for
- — Teams, companies, DAOs, funds, and advanced investors.
- — Intuitive UI: step‑by‑step creation with owners and threshold.
- — Brings multisig UX close to a regular app.
💬 Summary
Safe Wallet is a proven way to create secure multisig “smart accounts.” With polished UX and hundreds of integrations, it’s ideal for group use where a team must collectively approve spending.
Bottom line: Safe is the gold standard for EVM multisig.
If you need a shared wallet for ERC‑20s or NFTs, this is usually the first choice.
Electrum
Electrum is a legendary Bitcoin wallet dating back to 2011—a desktop app (Windows/Mac/Linux) for technically savvy users. Multisig support arrived shortly after Bitcoin introduced it.
💰 Supported currencies
- — Bitcoin (BTC) only.
- — Specialized—doesn’t support other coins.
🔑 Multisig features
- — Multi‑signature wallet mode during setup.
- — Configure number of co‑owners (N) and required signatures (M).
- — Recommended patterns: 2‑of‑3, 3‑of‑5; up to 15 keys possible.
- — Each co‑owner uses a hardware wallet or an extended public key (xpub).
- — Generates a shared multisig address (P2WSH or P2SH).
- — Signing requires connecting devices and collecting M signatures.
🖥️ UI & devices
- — Minimalist UI aimed at experienced users.
- — Supports hardware wallets (Ledger, Trezor, Coldcard, etc.).
- — Android app with limited functionality (multisig is awkward on mobile).
- — Typical flow: multiple PCs with Electrum exchange PSBTs (QR/USB) for sequential signing.
📂 Open source
- — Fully open (MIT license).
- — Community‑maintained; code reviewed regularly.
👥 Who it’s for
- — Bitcoin enthusiasts, long‑term holders, large‑balance custodians.
- — Those willing to handle technical details.
- — Can be daunting for beginners.
✨ Highlights
- — Doesn’t download the full chain; connects to external servers (you can run your own).
- — PSBT support, Bitcoin Core compatibility, multiple accounts.
- — Recommended in many self‑custody guides as a multisig standard.
Takeaway: Electrum is a time‑tested tool for Bitcoin multisig. It offers maximum flexibility to those who want full control, but it expects technical competence and isn’t a “simple wizard.”
Casa
Casa (Casa HODL / Keys.Casa) is a multisig service designed to make Bitcoin storage highly secure for end users. Launched in 2018, Casa offers a turnkey solution for large BTC holdings with multisig—no DIY setup required.
💰 Supported assets
- — Primarily Bitcoin.
- — Since 2023, limited stablecoin support for enterprise clients.
- — Target audience: BTC holders.
🔑 Scheme
- — 3‑of‑5 configuration (five keys; three required).
- — 3 keys with the client (e.g., two hardware devices + a mobile key).
- — 1 key held by Casa for emergency assistance.
- — 1 cold key with Casa for recovery.
- — Casa cannot spend without the client but can help recover access.
📱 Services & UI
- — Mobile app (iOS/Android) for balances and approvals.
- — 24/7 support; dedicated managers for premium tiers.
- — Extras: inheritance planning, reminders, seed‑checkups.
- — Simplified signing without manual PSBT juggling.
📂 Openness
- — Built on open standards (PSBT, BIP‑32/xpub).
- — Apps/backend are proprietary.
- — Casa holds only a subset of keys and can’t move funds unilaterally.
👥 Who it’s for
- — High‑net‑worth BTC owners not keen on deep technical ops.
- — Willing to pay for convenience and security.
- — Tiers from basic (3‑of‑5) to premium (custom, up to 6‑of‑9).
✨ Highlights
- — Works with major hardware wallets (Ledger, Trezor, Coldcard, etc.).
- — Guidance on splitting keys across different vendors.
- — Clean handling of xpubs and signing coordination.
- — “Health Check” to ensure keys remain accessible.
Takeaway: Casa shows how to turn complex multisig into a polished, reliable service. Ideal for affluent users who value security and accept a trusted provider for part of the workflow. Not fully open source, but it has earned a solid reputation over the years.
BitGo
BitGo is a pioneer of multisig custody, focused on institutions and enterprises. It launched the first Bitcoin multisig wallet in 2013, shortly after Mt. Gox’s collapse, giving exchanges/funds a safer storage method. Today BitGo is a large custodian; its approach began with a 2‑of‑3 multisig model.
💰 Supported assets
- — Bitcoin and Ethereum (contract wallets).
- — ERC‑20 tokens and several other chains.
- — Chain‑specific multisig or threshold controls.
🔑 Model
- — 2‑of‑3: one key with the client, one with BitGo, one backup (client or third‑party agent).
- — BitGo co‑signs—funds can’t move without it.
- — Neither party can spend alone.
- — Full custody options available to meet regulatory needs; multisig remains core.
🔒 Security & features
- — IP whitelists and withdrawal limits.
- — HSM key storage with geo‑redundancy.
- — Large insurance coverage.
- — Security audits.
- — Technology has protected tens of billions of dollars in transactions.
🖥️ Interface
- — APIs and a web platform for exchanges and enterprises.
- — Mobile confirmations for signing.
- — Mostly used as backend infrastructure for services.
📂 Openness
- — Commercial, closed‑source software.
- — The 2‑of‑3 pattern on Bitcoin is open and replicable.
👥 Who it’s for
- — Institutions, exchanges, fintech companies.
- — Those needing full compliance with KYC/AML plus resilient custody.
- — Not a direct consumer wallet.
Takeaway: BitGo is the originator of institutional multisig. Many modern methods trace back to its early work. Despite the rise of MPC and other models, BitGo is still a benchmark for enterprise‑grade security.
🏦 Coinbase Vault
Launched in 2014 for Coinbase customers, requiring multiple approvals and a 48‑hour delay on withdrawals. Partly implemented via 2‑of‑3 multisig (keys with the user, Coinbase, and a recovery party). While Coinbase’s custody model has evolved, the “family safe” idea on exchanges gained traction with this product.
📱 Blockstream Green
Formerly GreenAddress. Uses a 2‑of‑2 scheme: one key with the user, one on Blockstream’s server. Server 2FA is required to move funds—stealing a phone alone isn’t enough. Supports Bitcoin and Liquid Network; aimed at mainstream users.
💼 Unchained Capital
Similar to Casa, but with financial services, including BTC‑backed loans. Uses 2‑of‑3: two keys with the client, one with Unchained. Offers Caravan (open‑source web tool) and key‑holding services. For lending, collateral BTC sits in multisig co‑owned by borrower and lender.
🖥️ Specter Desktop & Sparrow Wallet
Two open‑source apps that simplify Bitcoin multisig setup. Specter integrates with Bitcoin Core and hardware wallets to create 2‑of‑3, 3‑of‑5, etc. in a few clicks. Sparrow also supports multisig and provides advanced transaction analysis tools.
📲 Nunchuk
A mobile wallet (since 2021) that streamlines multisig with remote coordination. Invite co‑owners and sign transactions over an encrypted channel. It gained attention after refusing requests to freeze protestors’ wallets in Canada, emphasizing privacy and freedom.
◎ Squads (Solana)
The leading Solana multisig protocol—effectively the main user‑friendly shared wallet in the ecosystem. Has a web UI and CLI; supports hardware signers via Backpack. Rapidly evolving, pushing on‑chain treasury management for Solana teams.
Takeaway: the multisig landscape ranges from consumer apps to enterprise services. The best choice depends on your goals, technical comfort, and how much you’re willing to trust third parties.
Conclusion
Multisig has evolved from a niche tool to a core security primitive. In 2024–2025 it’s available across major platforms—natively or via robust smart contracts. It removes single‑user failure points and helps balance control with safety.
🔒 What multisig delivers
- — Greater resilience: multiple signatures are required to move funds.
- — Lower risk of theft and single‑user mistakes.
- — Ideal for treasuries, funds, family safes, and DAOs.
- — Not a silver bullet: adds operational overhead and requires discipline.
👥 Who it suits today
- — Everyday users via friendly services (Safe, Casa, BNB Safe) without deep tech knowledge.
- — Institutions, together with audits, procedures, and insurance.
- — Power users via DIY tools (Electrum, Specter, Sparrow, Nunchuk) for maximum control.
🧭 What’s next
- — Account Abstraction: smart accounts with built‑in multisig logic.
- — Cross‑chain UX: one interface for multisig in multiple networks.
- — Deeper DeFi: automated strategies gated by collective approvals.
In crypto, security is a process, not a one‑time setup. The ecosystem continues to refine multisig, making it more accessible and reliable. If you hold meaningful sums or manage shared funds, consider multisig as the next step in your opsec evolution.
Bottom line: multisig materially improves security by eliminating single‑key failure points. It’s becoming ever more accessible—and for large balances or shared budgets, it’s the logical next step: your coins under the control of your (and your trusted partners’) keys only.
FAQ
What is a multisig wallet in simple terms?
A crypto wallet that requires multiple signatures from different private keys to execute operations. Think “a safe with several locks”: one signature isn’t enough to move funds.
When does multisig make sense?
When you need stronger storage security or to share control among several people. It’s optimal for large balances, shared funds, corporate treasuries, and any case where one key shouldn’t grant full access.
What if one key in a multisig is lost?
If one key is lost and your scheme requires multiple signatures, funds remain accessible: other co‑owners can still manage the wallet. But losing too many keys (beyond your redundancy) will lock access. Keep backup keys and a recovery plan.
Can I create a multisig wallet in MetaMask or Trust Wallet?
No—popular wallets like MetaMask and Trust Wallet don’t natively support multisig. Use specialized apps (e.g., Safe, Electrum) or web interfaces. Some mobile wallets are adding multisig over time, but it’s not widespread yet.
What are the most popular multisig wallets?
Among the best‑known: Safe (Gnosis Safe) for Ethereum/EVM; Electrum for Bitcoin; Casa for affluent BTC holders; and institutional custodians like BitGo. Others include Unchained Capital, Blockstream Green, Nunchuk, and more (all covered above).
Does the average user need multisig?
For everyday small sums, multisig can be overkill—it adds steps and requires multiple devices or people. But if you’ve accumulated meaningful funds or want maximum protection against theft and mistakes, it’s valuable—especially when large assets are at stake.
How secure are multisig wallets?
Configured properly, multisig is significantly safer than single‑key wallets: no single point of failure makes compromise much harder. You must still store each key securely and trust your co‑signers. Use audited, proven implementations. Overall, multisig is one of the most effective ways to protect crypto assets.